Irony has a new name: World of Warcraft soap
Irony doesn’t get much sweeter than this - World of Warcraft soap. Is it the most redundant item in the history of mankind, or the most earth shatteringly brilliant ploy to get WoW addicts to bathe? Either way you can purchase them on Etsy for $14.87 which entitles you to two soaps from a wide range of fragrances.
via Kotaku
Like this post? 
Subscribe to our RSS feed.
Subscribe to our RSS feed.Hi there Stumblers!
If you liked this post, please remember to hit the Thumbs Up (I like it!) button in your toolbar.
Be sure to check out these other posts that StumbleUpon users have enjoyed:
June 16th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
Yet another internet user who doesn’t understand “irony”
June 17th, 2008 at 6:08 pm
That is not ironic, and you are an idiot.
June 17th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Soap for people who don’t bathe? That IS ironic. You’re the idiot.
June 17th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Thats the thing thats stupid though, WoW players do bath, even if its not as much as normal people.
June 17th, 2008 at 10:41 pm
I gave a thumbs-down because of the “hello stumblers” part.
Anyway That is fairly ironic though, but damn expensive.
June 18th, 2008 at 2:13 am
I don’t think you know what ironic or redundant mean.
June 18th, 2008 at 3:57 am
I’ll take 12!
June 18th, 2008 at 4:49 am
Andrew used both irony and redundant incorrectly in this post - thanks to everyone who pointed that out. I should have caught it in editing, but it’s less of an issue now that Andrew is no longer writing for the site.
The funny thing is how much traffic this post is generating - and the amount of nerves it seems to be hitting. Toughen up people - there’s a social stigma attached to every facet of gaming culture, and rarely are they accurate.
June 18th, 2008 at 3:17 pm
Because obviously they had a nerve struck to correct someone on not knowing how to use a word while mudslinging RIGHT? oh hey no you’re not damn that sucks.
June 26th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Thanx For sharing such a beautiful resource. I really appreciate it..
June 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm
@Walrus - No, when I reference the struck nerves, I’m not talking of those who corrected Andrew’s English - notice the two different paragraphs. Go check some of the comments on StumbleUpon